I also found in this reading a new appreciation for the voice, one that I realized is very much brought out through the writing. Those panels where it is necessary to look at the art to make sense of the text are not critical to making sense of the story overall. This is because the text carries the story completely. However a rereading focusing on the text has changed my mind. First of all, I found it surprisingly easy to do.

Other components of a book, such as illustrations, overall design of the book, etc., may be considered when they make the book less effective. The committee is to make its decision primarily on the text. Each book is to be considered as a contribution to American literature. About this affecting and funny childhood memoir, I wrote elsewhere, “While Bell doesn’t shy away from issues dealing with her hearing loss, doing so with wit and a refreshing lack of self-pity, it is the search for a good friend that will resonate most with young readers.” I’ve definitely been part of the buzzing (say over at Heavy Medal where I put it as the first of my 3 votes for their online Mock Newbery), but also have been dubious about its chances due to this part of the criteria that the award committee is required to follow:Ģ. I don’t usually do single titles for this series, but am making an exception for Cece Bell’s El Deafo, a graphic novel that is getting some serious Newbery buzz.

El deafo book 2